ArticleDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2025
Detecting congenital chiasmal misrouting using multichannel VEPs: protocol for a scoping review.
Article in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Albinism: Clinical presentation, diagnostics and visual function].Die Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe present the protocol of a prospective scoping review which aims to understand how multi-channel visual evoked potentials (mcVEPs) are used to investigate congenital chiasmal misrouting and what outcomes are measured, interpreted and reported.
introductionmcVEPs are used for the objective evaluation of chiasmal misrouting, which is characterized by a crossed asymmetry in the distribution of cortical responses over each hemisphere during monocular stimulation, and is often observed in patients with albinism. The application and analysis of mcVEPs varies across centers, creating a need to explore the range of practice regarding their conduct and reporting and to identify potential areas for adaptation or optimization or guidelines for specific populations. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Peer reviewed and grey literature on the use of mcVEP to detect chiasmal misrouting in humans with non-acquired pathologies will be considered. All literature providing details of mcVEP methodology for replication and specification of chiasmal misrouting will be included for review.
methodsSearches will be conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science with the expertise of a librarian. The search will be conducted with no limitation on time period, but will be restricted to the Latin alphabet. Titles and abstracts will be screened by two investigators with conflicts resolved by a third investigator. Included articles will proceed with data extraction on study details including methodology, design, and outcomes. The results will be synthesized and mapped for logical understanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40580395What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.