Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40580366›Full record

ArticleJournal of immigrant and minority health2025

Exploring Barriers To Visual Screening for Canadian Immigrants in a General Primary Care Clinic: A Retrospective Chart Review.

Ramez Michail, Ernest Chan, Tim Holland

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ramez MichailDalhousie University, Halifax, Canada. ramez.michail@dal.ca.
Ernest ChanDalhousie University, Halifax, Canada. ernest.chan@dal.ca.
Tim HollandDalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-school visual health screening (visual acuity, pupillary response, visual fields, and eye movements) is vital to detect visual disorders in children. Previous studies show the prevalence of significant eye diagnoses in children to be approximately 6.7%, highlighting the importance of early intervention to prevent permanent vision loss and support educational development. This retrospective chart review aimed to compare the completion rates of visual health screenings and iron level screenings in Canadian immigrant children (ages 2–6) in a general primary care clinic. By analyzing 113 Post Arrival Health Assessments (PAHA) from an immigrant health clinic, this study investigated whether visual screenings are under-prioritized compared to other routinely completed assessments, such as iron deficiency testing. Our study found that of 113 children who completed a PAHA between 2020 and 2024, only 26/113 (23.0%) had a complete visual screen, defined as including at minimum monocular visual acuity testing, whereas 112/113 (99.1%) had a screen for iron deficiency anemia. A statistically significant difference was found between the completion rates of visual screenings and iron deficiency anemia screening (χ² = 134.46, p < 0.001). These findings support our hypothesis that visual health screenings are significantly under-prioritized compared to other routine tests. This is likely due to cultural, language, time and social barriers. Since the completion of the study, a student-run vision clinic has screened over 150 children and connected them with community optometrists. Moving forward, the research team will continue to advocate for integrating culturally inclusive education into medical school curricula to better support the health of immigrant communities.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsPrimary Health CareVision DisordersVision ScreeningAnemia, Iron-DeficiencyCanadaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesHealth DisparitiesImmigrant HealthScreeningVisual Health

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.