ArticleJournal of immigrant and minority health2025
Exploring Barriers To Visual Screening for Canadian Immigrants in a General Primary Care Clinic: A Retrospective Chart Review.
Article in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pre-school visual health screening (visual acuity, pupillary response, visual fields, and eye movements) is vital to detect visual disorders in children. Previous studies show the prevalence of significant eye diagnoses in children to be approximately 6.7%, highlighting the importance of early intervention to prevent permanent vision loss and support educational development. This retrospective chart review aimed to compare the completion rates of visual health screenings and iron level screenings in Canadian immigrant children (ages 2–6) in a general primary care clinic. By analyzing 113 Post Arrival Health Assessments (PAHA) from an immigrant health clinic, this study investigated whether visual screenings are under-prioritized compared to other routinely completed assessments, such as iron deficiency testing. Our study found that of 113 children who completed a PAHA between 2020 and 2024, only 26/113 (23.0%) had a complete visual screen, defined as including at minimum monocular visual acuity testing, whereas 112/113 (99.1%) had a screen for iron deficiency anemia. A statistically significant difference was found between the completion rates of visual screenings and iron deficiency anemia screening (χ² = 134.46, p < 0.001). These findings support our hypothesis that visual health screenings are significantly under-prioritized compared to other routine tests. This is likely due to cultural, language, time and social barriers. Since the completion of the study, a student-run vision clinic has screened over 150 children and connected them with community optometrists. Moving forward, the research team will continue to advocate for integrating culturally inclusive education into medical school curricula to better support the health of immigrant communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40580366What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.