ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2025
Emerging Artificial Intelligence Innovations in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Challenges to Clinical Adoption.
Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of Artificial Intelligence in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Advancements and Novel Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Diagnostic Modalities in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Deep Learning Classification of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Hand Radiographs Interpretability Insights and Web Application.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review was written to inform practicing clinical rheumatologists about recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) based research in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), using accessible and practical language. We highlight developments from 2023 to early 2025 across diagnostic imaging, treatment prediction, drug discovery, and patient-facing tools. Given the increasing clinical interest in AI and its potential to augment care delivery, this article aims to bridge the gap between technical innovation and real-world rheumatology practice. RECENT
findingsSeveral AI models have demonstrated high accuracy in early RA detection using imaging modalities such as thermal imaging and nuclear scans. Predictive models for treatment response have leveraged routinely collected electronic health record (EHR) data, moving closer to practical application in clinical workflows. Patient-facing tools like mobile symptom checkers and large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT show promise in enhancing education and engagement, although accuracy and safety remain variable. AI has also shown utility in identifying novel biomarkers and accelerating drug discovery. Despite these advances, as of early 2025, no AI-based tools have received FDA approval for use in rheumatology, in contrast to other specialties. Artificial intelligence holds tremendous promise to enhance clinical care in RA-from early diagnosis to personalized therapy. However, clinical adoption remains limited due to regulatory, technical, and implementation challenges. A streamlined regulatory framework and closer collaboration between clinicians, researchers, and industry partners are urgently needed. With thoughtful integration, AI can serve as a valuable adjunct in addressing clinical complexity and workforce shortages in rheumatology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40580343What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.