ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025
Isothermal Amplification Techniques: An Emerging Tool for On-Site Detection of Phytopathogens in Field Conditions.
Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research progress on nucleic acid amplification-based detection technologies for phytopathogenic fungi.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Buruli ulcer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025Review
- Development of a rapid on-site nucleic acid detection method for new genotype muscovy duck parvovirus based on RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This chapter reviews various isothermal amplification techniques, which are alternative to PCR for detecting plant pathogens. These methods, including NASBA, SDA, LAMP, HDA, and RPA, amplify nucleic acids at a constant temperature, making them potentially more suitable for point-of-care (POC) applications. The review compares these techniques regarding their mechanisms, advantages, and limitations, highlighting their potential for rapid, cost-effective, and on-site plant disease diagnosis, including the integration of these techniques with CRISPR-Cas systems and lab-on-a-chip technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40580284What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.