ArticleAmerican journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions2025
Disproportionality Analysis of Ivabradine in the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System: A Real-World Study Across Overall and Indication-Specific Populations.
Article in American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anticoagulation Therapies and microRNAs in Heart Failure.Biomolecules · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIvabradine, a selective I
objectiveThis study analyzed ivabradine-associated adverse events (AEs) using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System, with a focus on overall patterns and indication-specific subgroups.
methodsWe reviewed reports from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System from quarter 2, 2015, to quarter 2, 2024, and conducted a disproportionality analysis using four methods: reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and empirical Bayesian geometric mean. We stratified AEs by clinical indications (tachycardia, heart failure, coronary artery disease) and prioritized them using a semi-quantitative scoring system and important or designated medical event criteria as defined by the European Medicines Agency.
resultsA total of 2733 ivabradine-related AE reports were identified, involving 24 system organ classes. Cardiac disorders (n = 1045) and eye disorders (n = 352) were most frequent, with bradycardia, arrhythmias, and photopsia being the leading events. Subgroup analyses revealed distinct AE profiles: sinus tachycardia and supraventricular tachycardia in the tachycardia subgroup; blurred vision and angina in coronary artery disease; and severe AEs-such as dyspnea, prolonged QT interval, and ventricular fibrillation-primarily in heart failure. One rare but notable designated medical event, transient blindness (n = 3), was also identified.
conclusionIvabradine shows an overall favorable safety profile. Most AEs appear related to underlying disease or comedications rather than intrinsic drug toxicity. These findings support indication-specific monitoring to enhance clinical safety and pharmacovigilance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40580276What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.