ArticleJournal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs2025
Hemodynamic changes and mid-term results of surgical correction of de novo aortic valve insufficiency after left ventricular assist device implantation.
Article in Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Worldwide research trends on left ventricular assist devices for heart failure: a bibliometric analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe aortic insufficiency (AI) is a common complication associated with prolonged continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) therapy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes after surgical correction of de novo AI after LVAD implantation. A total of 190 patients underwent CF-LVAD implantation between January 2013 and June 2022. Of these, 24 had trivial or no AI before LVAD implantation and developed moderate or greater de novo AI after LVAD implantation. Patients who underwent aortic valve surgery before or concomitant with LVAD surgery were excluded. Among the 24 patients, surgeries were indicated for medically refractory de novo AI in 11 patients, who were included. The primary outcome was postoperative improvement in hemodynamics as assessed by right heart catheter examination, and the secondary endpoints were 3-year survival and freedom from death and/or heart failure readmission rates. The correction of de novo AI was accomplished with aortic valve closure using a bovine pericardial patch in 10 patients and prosthetic valve replacement in one patient. Significant differences (all p < 0.01) in pre- vs. post-surgery pulmonary artery wedge pressure, cardiac index, and mixed venous blood oxygen saturation were found. The mean follow-up period after LVAD implantation was 1413 days, and the 3-year survival rate was 90.9%. Three-year freedom from postoperative moderate or greater AI rate and freedom from heart failure readmission rate were both 90.9%. Postoperative hemodynamic status and survival outcomes are favorable in patients who underwent surgical aortic valve repair de novo AI after LVAD implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.