SynthesisCurrent nutrition reports2025
Understanding the Use of Community Involvement in Rural Food Environment Modifications: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Current nutrition reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewRural communities experience higher rates of adverse health outcomes compared to their urban counterparts, and involving community members in intervention design and implementation is increasingly recognized as a pivotal factor in fostering successful intervention outcomes. This review aims to synthesize the evidence on rural food environment modifications globally, and to understand the role and involvement of community members in these interventions. Eligible records were dated between 1st January 2011 and 6th September 2024. Two independent reviewers conducted screening, quality assessment, and data extraction. Studies were included if they addressed a food environment, described food environment modifications, indicated community involvement, were based in regional or rural areas and published in English. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Results were reported as a narrative synthesis. RECENT
findingsThirty-three studies were eligible for inclusion following appraisal of full texts, comprised of 46 reports. Of these, 12 studies (16 reports) focused on First Nations populations and will be reported separately, due to the complex and sensitive nature of engaging with these communities. Therefore, 21 studies (30 reports) were included in this review. Study designs were heterogenous. Restaurants, supermarkets and schools were a common focus for modifications, while some programs simultaneously targeted several food environments. However, community involvement was inconsistently reported across studies, making conclusions about involvement difficult. Standardized reporting of the involvement of community members is needed to ensure systematic and authentic approaches to community involvement are integrated into rural public health interventions and research to enhance success. REGISTRATION: Prospero; CRD42023400455.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.