ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025
Comparable long-term pain and disability outcomes following decompression alone versus decompression with fusion in lumbar spinal stenosis patients with high-signal facet joints.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of decompressive surgery with or without fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) exhibiting high-signal facet joints, a radiological marker of potential instability.
methodsA retrospective cohort study analysed surgeries performed by a single surgeon between January 2016 and June 2023. Eligible participants (n = 100) were adults with LSS who underwent decompression with or without fusion and were followed up using validated questionnaires to assess pain (VAS back, VAS leg) and disability (ODI, RMDQ). Statistical analyses included t-tests, ANOVA, and logistic regression to evaluate clinical outcomes.
resultsFifty-seven patients underwent decompressive surgery (SD), and 43 underwent decompression with fusion (DF). DF patients were younger (67.67 vs. 73.07 years, p = 0.0008) and more likely to exhibit radiological markers of instability, including L5-S1 involvement (p = 0.0315) and Grade 1 spondylolisthesis (p = 0.0118). Both groups showed significant improvements in pain and disability scores (p < 0.0001), with no significant differences between groups at follow-up. DF was associated with longer hospital stays (3.07 vs. 1.70 days, p < 0.0001) but fewer revision surgeries (2.33% vs. 15.79%, p = 0.0402). Higher BMI reduced odds of ODI improvement in the SD group (p = 0.0252), while older age decreased the odds of RMDQ improvement in the DF group (p = 0.0102).
conclusionBoth surgical approaches yielded significant improvements in pain and disability for patients with LSS. The findings suggest fusion may not be necessary for patients with high-signal facet joints absent additional instability markers, supporting a tailored approach to surgical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40580226What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.