Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40580186›Full record

ReviewMedical gas research2026

Application of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the treatment of spinal cord injury: insights from preclinical to clinical evidence.

Songyang Peng, Lin Zeng, Bing Lu, Qizheng Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical gas research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Songyang PengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Lin ZengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Bing LuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Qizheng LiDepartment of Neurology, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7651-564

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a severe trauma that leads to significant motor, sensory, and autonomic dysfunction, imposing a substantial disease burden and economic costs globally. The pathophysiology of SCI involves primary and secondary injury stages, with the latter characterized by inflammatory responses, apoptosis, and tissue necrosis. Current therapeutic interventions, including pharmacological treatments and stem cell therapies, provide limited benefits and do not fully address the therapeutic effects on SCI. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT), which delivers 100% oxygen at pressures exceeding 1 atmosphere absolute, has shown potential in SCI animal models due to its antiapoptotic, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and angiogenesis-promoting effects, thereby limiting secondary injury. Clinical studies have also demonstrated some efficacy of HBOT in treating SCI; however, the optimal timing, duration, and treatment cycles of HBOT remain contentious, and long-term efficacy has yet to be assessed. This review synthesizes the basic research and clinical practice of HBOT for SCI, thereby summarizing the main mechanistic pathways and demonstrating its clinical effects. Future large-scale, multicenter clinical studies are warranted to determine the efficacy and safety of HBOT in treating SCI and explore combined therapeutic modalities for a more comprehensive treatment approach.

Indexed as

Hyperbaric OxygenationSpinal Cord InjuriesAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicHumansantiapoptoticanti-inflammatoryantioxidantclinical efficacyhyperbaric oxygen therapyliterature reviewneuroprotectionprospectspinal cord injurytheoretical models

Identifiers

PMID40580186
PMCPMC12318580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.