ArticleAnnals of medicine2025
Development and validation of an improved prediction model for vaginal birth after previous cesarean section: a retrospective cohort study of a Chinese population.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Trial of Labor After Cesarean and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Determinants of early lactation failure in mothers of moderately preterm neonates: a multilevel analysis of survey data.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe transition from one-child to two-child and three-child policy in China has increasingly led to a rise in the number of women who choose trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC). Achieving vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) is, however, not always guaranteed, and a failed TOLAC is associated with a high risk of maternal and neonatal complications. Although Grobman's model may help predict VBAC, variations in population characteristics and healthcare settings can limit its generalizability and validity on a global scale. This study, therefore, seeks to develop and validate an improved prediction model for VBAC at the onset of labor among the Chinese population.
methodsSeven hundred and twenty women who attempted a TOLAC were enrolled. The development dataset comprised 481 women, while the other 239 women constituted the temporal validation dataset. Variable selection was executed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method. Model development was performed using logistic regression techniques and was presented as a nomogram.
resultsOf the participants, 81.4% achieved VBAC. The model included maternal age, maternal height, ratio of weight gain to pre-pregnancy weight, interval time of pregnancies, previous vaginal delivery, premature rupture of membranes, oxytocin administration, spontaneous labor onset, labor analgesia, and newborn weight. The development and temporally validated areas under the curve were 0.780 (95% confidence interval 0.726-0.834) and 0.774 (95% confidence interval 0.694-0.854), respectively. Internal validation performed by bootstrap resampling, calibration curves, and Hosmer-Lemeshow test confirmed the model's robust performance. An optimal predicted probability cut-off of 0.7 was identified by decision curve analysis and clinical considerations.
conclusionsThe improved predictive VBAC model exhibited adequate performance such that women with a prior low transverse cesarean delivery who scored 0.7 or higher (in the model-derived probability score) would consider TOLAC, potentially leading to a reduction in maternal-neonatal morbidity. REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University (2018-43) and was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1900022484), https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=37898. The study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki. The first participant was enrolled on January 1, 2016. The requirement for informed consent was waived because the data were anonymized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.