Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40580104›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2025

Development and validation of an improved prediction model for vaginal birth after previous cesarean section: a retrospective cohort study of a Chinese population.

Haiyan Liu, Yi Yu, Xiaoyue Zhang, Jiangnan Pei, Yao Tang, Rong Hu, Weirong Gu

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haiyan LiuDepartment of Obstetrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3812-7520
Yi YuDepartment of Obstetrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoyue ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jiangnan PeiDepartment of Obstetrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yao TangDepartment of Obstetrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Rong HuDepartment of Obstetrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Weirong GuDepartment of Obstetrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2157-0454

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe transition from one-child to two-child and three-child policy in China has increasingly led to a rise in the number of women who choose trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC). Achieving vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) is, however, not always guaranteed, and a failed TOLAC is associated with a high risk of maternal and neonatal complications. Although Grobman's model may help predict VBAC, variations in population characteristics and healthcare settings can limit its generalizability and validity on a global scale. This study, therefore, seeks to develop and validate an improved prediction model for VBAC at the onset of labor among the Chinese population.

methodsSeven hundred and twenty women who attempted a TOLAC were enrolled. The development dataset comprised 481 women, while the other 239 women constituted the temporal validation dataset. Variable selection was executed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method. Model development was performed using logistic regression techniques and was presented as a nomogram.

resultsOf the participants, 81.4% achieved VBAC. The model included maternal age, maternal height, ratio of weight gain to pre-pregnancy weight, interval time of pregnancies, previous vaginal delivery, premature rupture of membranes, oxytocin administration, spontaneous labor onset, labor analgesia, and newborn weight. The development and temporally validated areas under the curve were 0.780 (95% confidence interval 0.726-0.834) and 0.774 (95% confidence interval 0.694-0.854), respectively. Internal validation performed by bootstrap resampling, calibration curves, and Hosmer-Lemeshow test confirmed the model's robust performance. An optimal predicted probability cut-off of 0.7 was identified by decision curve analysis and clinical considerations.

conclusionsThe improved predictive VBAC model exhibited adequate performance such that women with a prior low transverse cesarean delivery who scored 0.7 or higher (in the model-derived probability score) would consider TOLAC, potentially leading to a reduction in maternal-neonatal morbidity. REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University (2018-43) and was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1900022484), https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=37898. The study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki. The first participant was enrolled on January 1, 2016. The requirement for informed consent was waived because the data were anonymized.

Indexed as

Trial of LaborVaginal Birth after CesareanAdultChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaternal AgeNomogramsOxytocinPregnancyRetrospective StudiesOxytocinChinese populationinterval time of pregnanciesprediction modelratio of weight gain to pre-pregnancy weighttemporal validationVaginal birth after cesarean

Identifiers

PMID40580104
PMCPMC12207765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.