ArticleEpilepsia2025
Contribution of perineuronal nets to hyperexcitability in pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus.
Article in Epilepsia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extracellular matrix remodelling in neurological diseases.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
- Severity-dependent proteomic alterations in the rat hippocampus following pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus.Molecular and cellular neurosciences · 2026Article
- THIK-1 channel mediates microglial glucose sensing and modulates AgRP neurons.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Severity-dependent proteomic alterations in the rat hippocampus following pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The Plasminogen Activation System in the Central Nervous System: Implications for Epilepsy and Neuropsychiatric Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Contribution of perineuronal nets to hyperexcitability in pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus.Epilepsia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveChanges in extracellular matrix (ECM) and highly condensed ECM structures called perineuronal nets (PNNs) have been reported in human patients with epilepsy as well as some animal models of epilepsy. We studied potential ECM changes in a mouse model of pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus (PISE) and their potential contributions to seizures.
methodsWe used a reduced intensity pilocarpine model to induce status epilepticus (SE) in mice. Wisteria floribunda agglutinin (WFA) staining was used to identify PNNs. Immunohistochemistry, patch-clamp electrophysiology, drug studies, and transcriptomic analysis were used to assess changes in gene expression and physiological properties of the PNN-surrounded cells.
resultsWFA immunohistochemical staining shows de novo synthesis of PNNs around a heterogeneous population of interneurons, suggesting both inhibitory and disinhibitory neurons acquired PNNs post-SE. Patch-clamp electrophysiology from these cells indicates hyperexcitability in PNN-bearing neurons in PISE mice, without a change in intrinsic cell properties except for afterhyperpolarization. Enzymatic degradation of PNNs partially rescued hyperexcitability but did not fully reverse it, suggesting that PNNs are at least in part necessary for the observed hyperexcitability. Other likely contributors include changes in ion channels that underly afterhyperpolarization (e.g., K SIGNIFICANCE: De novo formation of PNNs around interneurons in the CA1 region contribute to hyperexcitability of the cells they surround. This acquisition of PNNs is associated with a compensatory or causative mechanism occurring in the wake of PISE, with implications for PNNs in epileptogenesis and possibly other acquired forms of epilepsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.