Adapting the MPOWER policy framework for fossil fuels and public health: reflections on content and process.

T Keller, I Braithwaite, A Brook, J Beagley, S Narayan, T A Deivanayagam

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Interventions involving young people for health equity targeting the fossil fuel industry's practices and products: A realist review protocol.PloS one · 2026
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

T KellerUK Faculty of Public Health, London, UK.

I BraithwaiteUK Faculty of Public Health, Primary Care and Public Health Research Department, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5327-5612

A BrookUK Faculty of Public Health, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3771-3904

J BeagleyGlobal Climate and Health Alliance, Richmond, CA, USA.

S NarayanGlobal Climate and Health Alliance, Richmond, CA, USA.

T A DeivanayagamUK Faculty of Public Health, Institute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We argue in the paper that there is much to learn from previous public health advocacy and action against health-harming industries, such as tobacco, through a 'Commercial Determinants of Health' (CDoH) lens. The MPOWER framework is an example of work in tobacco control field which has been a valuable and cross-cutting framework used to guide and support tobacco policy implementation and prioritisation since its development in 2008, contributing to progress in reducing smoking rates and associated morbidity and mortality.

Indexed as

Fossil FuelsHealth PolicyPublic HealthSmoking PreventionHumansSocial Determinants of HealthUnited KingdomFossil Fuels

Identifiers

PMID40580004

DOI10.1177/17579139251342161

PMCPMC12662816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.