ArticleCancer biology & medicine2025
Beyond gold: the chemoenhancing mechanism and therapeutic potential of auranofin in melanoma.
Article in Cancer biology & medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating the Synergistic Effect of the Cannabis Extract PHEC-66 and Chemotherapeutic Agents on Human Melanoma Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Auranofin Combination Therapy: A New Frontier in Cancer Treatment.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of the current study was to evaluate the chemosensitizing capacity of auranofin (AF), a gold (I) complex traditionally used in rheumatoid arthritis treatment, in potentiating the cytotoxic effects of doxorubicin (DOX) in melanoma cell models, specifically drug-sensitive (B16F10) and multidrug-resistant (B16F10/ADR) variants.
methodsExperimental measurements, including
resultsCo-treatment with AF and DOX significantly increased anti-tumor efficacy, as evidenced by reduced cell viability and increased apoptotic rates. This synergistic effect was attributed to inhibition of TrxR1 by AF, which compromised tumor cell antioxidant defenses and elevated intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), thereby enhancing apoptotic pathways. Notably, AF treatment mitigated the heightened TrxR activity in DOX-resistant cells, intensifying the pro-oxidant effects of DOX, leading to increased ROS production and cell death. The data also showed that AF binds with high affinity to the selenocysteine residue within the catalytic site of TrxR1, which partially overlapped with the binding site of the endogenous substrate, thioredoxin (Trx), but with greater avidity. This unique binding configuration impedes the reduction of Trx by TrxR1, triggering an apoptotic response in cancer cells.
conclusionsThis study underscores the chemosensitizing potential of AF in overcoming multidrug resistance in cancer therapy through redox modulation. The molecular mechanism of action underlying AF on TrxR1 demonstrated the unique binding configuration that impedes the reduction of Trx by TrxR1 and instigates an apoptotic response in cancer cells. These findings pave the way for the clinical application of AF as a chemosensitizer, offering a novel approach to augment the efficacy of existing chemotherapy regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.