ArticleTransfusion2025
West Nile Virus positivity amongst Canadian blood donors and effectiveness of off-season screening.
Article in Transfusion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Pathogen Reduction of Transfused Blood Components-The End of the Beginning Rather than the Beginning of the End.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- West Nile Virus positivity amongst Canadian blood donors and effectiveness of off-season screening.Transfusion · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe sought to examine the prevalence of West Nile Virus (WNV) nucleic acid test (NAT) positivity over time in Canadian blood donors, examine the level of false-positive NAT screening, and understand the effectiveness of travel-related testing outside of WNV seasonality in Canada. STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsAll blood donations in Canada (except Québec) between 2018 and 2023 were tested by the Roche Cobas WNV-NAT assay during the summer-fall season by Canadian Blood Services. Testing for recent travel outside Canada was performed in the winter-spring season. All 2023 WNV-NAT-positives were confirmed by two independent WNV-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCRs).
resultsWhile WNV positivity varied by location and time, no increasing trend of positivity was observed over the 6-year study period. No WNV-NAT-positive donors with a history of recent travel outside of Canada in the winter-spring season were identified by donor screening (2018-2023). In total, 2,454,102 samples were tested during summer months and 267,988 in winter months. In 2023, WNV-specific PCR confirmed 10 of 13 (76.9%) screening WNV-NATs. Recent Japanese Encephalitis Virus (JEV) vaccination was identified as a potential false positive for initial WNV screening results. DISCUSSION: Between 2018 and 2023, WNV-NAT positivity amongst Canadian blood donors remained stable, with no evidence of an increasing positivity trend. The utility of off-season travel-related testing may be limited, as no donors were identified during the six-year study timeframe. Finally, confirmation testing using WNV-specific PCR is recommended to identify true cases and to limit misidentification of other genetically similar viruses, such as JEV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.