ArticleAmerican journal of biological anthropology2025
Tracing Human Diversity in South America's Southern Cone: Linguistic, Morphometric, and Genetic Perspectives.
Article in American journal of biological anthropology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Commentary on Special Issue: "Towards a Biocultural Synthesis of the Peopling of the Americas".American journal of biological anthropology · 2025Article
- Toward a Biocultural Synthesis of the Peopling of the Americas: Introduction to the Special Issue.American journal of biological anthropology · 2025Article
- Tracing Human Diversity in South America's Southern Cone: Linguistic, Morphometric, and Genetic Perspectives.American journal of biological anthropology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesStudying the relationship between biological and cultural diversity can lead to rich insights into human history. South America has been relatively neglected in this kind of work, even though it intriguingly exhibits unexpectedly high biological and cultural diversity. Here, we focus on a particularly understudied part of the continent, the Southern Cone, and examine linguistic, craniometric, and genetic variation across five groups: Selk'nam, Qawaskar, Mapuche, Kunza, and Qom. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrieved craniometric and genetic data from public databases and coded linguistic data capturing variation in sound systems and grammatical structures specifically for this study. We calculated distance matrices (Mahalanobis, Jaccard, F
resultsSelk'nam and Qawaskar exhibit the strongest linguistic and craniometric similarities, likely due to geographic proximity, while Mapuche and Qom are the most genetically similar, reflecting recent migrations. Consistent with global studies, we observed a statistically significant correlation between the relatively plastic cranial vault morphology and the quickly evolving linguistic variables. Genetic variability was moderately related to geography, while the weakest correlation was found between the temporal bone morphology and genetic variation. DISCUSSION: Although this study is limited by a small sample size and requires further research validation with larger datasets, our findings highlight the importance of integrating multiple datasets to better understand the interplay between biological and cultural diversity in shaping human history. Our findings also indicate that structural linguistic data help reconstruct population history, particularly at recent and intermediate scales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.