ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
scTsI: an effective two-stage imputation method for single-cell RNA-seq data.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The changing landscape of gene expression analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Spatial information matters: are traditional imputation methods effective for spatial transcriptomics data?Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- scGACL: a generative adversarial network with multi-scale contrastive learning for accurate single-cell RNA sequencing imputation.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-cell RNA-seq facilitates the understanding of cell types and states and the revealing of the cellular heterogeneity in developmental processes and disease mechanisms. However, the dropout events in single-cell RNA-seq data, in which genes are not detected due to technical noise or limited sequencing depth, seriously affect downstream analyses. Imputation is an effective way to relieve the impact of dropout events. However, the current methods may introduce new noise or modify the high expression values in the imputation process and their performance may be lower than expected when dealing with data with a high dropout rate, facing with different types of data, and aiming at various downstream analyses. We propose a two-stage imputation algorithm, scTsI, for single-cell RNA-seq data. In the first stage, scTsI imputes the zero values using the information of neighboring cells and genes. In the second stage, scTsI transforms the expression matrix into a vector, performs row transformation, and adjusts the imputed values through ridge regression and leveraging bulk RNA-seq data as a constraint. scTsI ensures that the original highly expressed values are unchanged, avoids introducing new noise, and allows sparse matrix input to accelerate imputation. We conduct experiments on a variety of simulated and real data with different dropout rates and compare scTsI with the commonly used imputation methods. The results show that scTsI can restore gene expression and maintain cell-cell similarity across different data dimensions and dropout rates. scTsI can also improve the performance of data visualization, clustering, and cell trajectory inference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.