ArticleReproductive health2025
"It's me who supports. How are you going to refuse to have a child?": the social norms and gender dynamics of men's engagement in family planning practices in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Article in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Why male contraception still stalls: translational, social, and ethical gaps.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Modern contraceptive use, associated factors and reasons for non-use among young lactating mothers in the context of free family planning services in the Kaya municipality setting, Burkina Faso.Journal of public health in Africa · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), a disparity exists in the fertility desires of men and women, with men often expressing a desire for more children than their partners. This disconnect can be attributed to social and gender norms that influence discussions and decision-making regarding birth spacing, birth limiting, and the adoption of modern contraceptive methods. This qualitative study, through semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions, explored the social norms shaping perceptions, attitudes, and decision-making around family planning among men in the DRC.
methodsThe study protocol was adapted from the 5-step process set forth in the Social Norms Exploration Tool (SNET). Data collection took place in the three provinces of Kasai Central, Lualaba, and Sankuru. This process was divided into three phases: a reference-group identification phase incorporating a short, quantitative questionnaire, an exploration of norms and attitudes with the population of interest (N = 317) - here married and unmarried men - and further exploration of social norms among the reference groups (N = 144) cited by men.
resultsSocial norms around family planning are contradictory and can be better understood by breaking down the concept of family planning into three categories of descriptive and injunctive norms: 1) the use of modern contraceptive methods, 2) birth spacing and family size, and 3) couple communication and decision-making. We found that while social norms oppose the use of modern contraceptive methods and advocate for larger family size, there is notable social support for birth spacing. Some men reported they would support their wives in learning about contraceptive methods if they were able to make the final decision. However, other men felt that allowing their wives to seek a method would undermine their authority or their virility.
conclusionsTo increase modern contraceptive uptake, interventions should address the underlying issues that contribute to non-adherence, addressing the three categories and their associated norms individually and engaging reference groups important to each, including healthcare providers, religious leaders, and male peer groups, in family planning programming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.