ArticleNeurocritical care2026
Fast and Slow Recovery of Consciousness Following Traumatic Brain Injury.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Updates in Management of Acute Disorders of Consciousness After Traumatic Injury.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Contralateral hemispheric cerebral blood flow can predict short-term clinical outcomes in patients with recent small subcortical infarcts.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundConsciousness recovery after severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) can take minutes to years. Despite this variability, we hypothesized that we could identify subgroups with distinct temporal recovery trajectories and that these subgroups would have distinct clinical features.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study to analyze recovery trajectories for patients with sTBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score ≤ 8) admitted to Stony Brook University Hospital from 2010 to 2019. Patients meeting our criteria for recovery (GCS score ≥ 13) were classified into cohorts using the slopes of their recovery trajectories. We then characterized these groups by their clinical features, neuroimaging, and electroencephalography (EEG).
resultsA total of 501 patients with sTBI (348 men, mean age 51 years) were included in this study. Of these, 299 recovered. After analyzing their recovery rates, two distinct groups emerged, (1) fast recovery (n = 215) and (2) slow recovery (n = 84), with a median recovery time of 6 (interquartile range [IQR] 2-12) vs. 33 (IQR 27-44.75) days. Slow recovery patients had higher Injury Severity Scores (median 30 [IQR 25-41.75] vs. 24 [IQR 16-30]; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.4495-10.6105; P < 0.001), more thalamic injury on neuroimaging (normalized volume [voxels] - 0.664 vs. 1.74; R
conclusionsRecovery after sTBI falls into two broad categories, distinguishable by injury severity, thalamic injury, and disrupted interhemispheric connectivity. This model accounts for heterogeneity in TBI outcomes and represents progress toward identifying targets for future neuromodulatory therapeutic development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40579677What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.