Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40579655›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of behavioral medicine2026

Modelling the Associations Between the Physician-Patient Relationship and Patient Outcomes via Self-Determination Theory Variables in Chronic Disease Management.

Jessica A Eigeland, Robyn L Moffitt, Nicola Sheeran, Natalie Loxton, Liz Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of behavioral medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jessica A EigelandSchool of Applied Psychology, Mt Gravatt Campus, Griffith University, 176 Messines Ridge Road, Mount Gravatt 4122, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. jessica.arentz@griffithuni.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1815-1355
Robyn L MoffittSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Stress, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1933-4046
Nicola SheeranSchool of Applied Psychology, Mt Gravatt Campus, Griffith University, 176 Messines Ridge Road, Mount Gravatt 4122, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0527-8549
Natalie LoxtonSchool of Applied Psychology, Mt Gravatt Campus, Griffith University, 176 Messines Ridge Road, Mount Gravatt 4122, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7681-6458
Liz JonesDepartment of Psychology, Monash University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6566-5036

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to model the associations between the physician-patient relationship and patient outcomes, considering the mediating role of Self-Determination Theory variables.

methodThe current study comprised a sample (N = 226) of Australians with a diagnosed chronic health condition. Path analysis via structural equation modelling was used to model the relationships between patients' self-reported perception of the physician-patient relationship, motivation (autonomous and controlled), basic psychological needs (satisfaction and frustration), and patient outcomes (treatment adherence, mental health, and physical health).

resultsStronger physician-patient relationships indirectly predicted better physical and mental health, as well as greater adherence to treatment. This occurred through serial mediation, whereby stronger physician-patient relationships directly predicted need satisfaction, which in turn predicted autonomous motivation. Conversely, weaker physician-patient relationships indirectly predicted poorer mental health and lower adherence to treatment. This occurred through serial mediation where weaker physician-patient relationships predicted need frustration, which in turn predicted controlled motivation. Weaker physician-patient relationships also directly predicted controlled motivation.

conclusionSatisfaction of basic psychological needs plays an important role in predicting patient motivation and outcomes. The current findings provide evidence that the physician-patient relationship plays a direct role in facilitating satisfaction and frustration of psychological needs, as well as patient motivation. Attention should be placed on interventions aimed at improving the physician-patient relationship as a means through which to increase need satisfaction, autonomous motivation, and, consequently, patient adherence and outcomes.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementPersonal AutonomyPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAgedChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedModels, PsychologicalMotivationPatient CompliancePatient SatisfactionAdherenceAutonomous motivationChronic conditionsPhysician-patient relationshipSelf-determination

Identifiers

PMID40579655
PMCPMC13623766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.