ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2025
Comparison of transcriptome profiles of radiotherapy beams on MCF-7 breast cancer xenografts.
Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the acute radiobiological mechanisms underlying Flattening Filter (FF) and Flattening Filter Free (FFF) radiotherapy-induced inhibition of breast cancer (BCa) by detecting changes in gene expression levels. The study involved thirty-six adult nude mice models that were randomly divided into five groups: control (G1), breast cancer (BCa) (G2), FF-400 (G3), FFF-1120 (G4), and FFF-1820 (G5). The control group had no radiation or treatment, while the BCa group had a cancer model but no radiation. The BCa models were subjected to a single dose of 20 Gy of radiotherapy at varying dose rates: 400, 1120, and 1820 MU/min (G3, G4, and G5, respectively). Twenty days after implantation of the MCF-7 cancer cell line, nude mice were irradiated and sacrificed 48 h later for genetic analysis. A transcriptome library was created by extracting RNA from tissue samples. In the differentially expressed genes (DEG) analysis, a total of 1565 genes were found to be significantly altered in the G2 vs. G1 groups. When radiotherapy groups (G3, G4, and G5) were analyzed, 334 DEGs (231 down, 103 up) were identified in G3 vs G2 data, 167 DEGs (103 down, 64 up) in G4 vs G2 data, and 187 DEGs (116 down, 71 up) in G5 vs G2 data. Gene Ontology molecular function analysis revealed significant differences between groups G3 and G2, with an emphasis on protein binding, glutamate receptor activity, and interleukin-8 receptor activation. Similar features were observed when comparing groups G5 and G2. The analysis showed significant differences in the expression of the key ERAD pathway genes Ufd1 and Cav1 between the BCa and radiotherapy groups. It was concluded that the FFF beam significantly alters the processes underlying the ERAD pathway and glutamate receptor activation compared to the FF beam.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.