Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40579621›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2025

A multi-view CNN model to predict resolving of new lung nodules on follow-up low-dose chest CT.

Jingxuan Wang, Xiaowen Zhang, Wei Tang, Marcel van Tuinen, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Peter van Ooijen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. [Expert Consensus on Precision Management of Pulmonary Nodules (2026 Version)].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jingxuan WangDepartment of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. j.wang02@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1648-2679
Xiaowen ZhangDepartment of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Wei TangData Science in Health (DASH), University of Groningen, University Medical Center of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marcel van TuinenDepartment of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Rozemarijn VliegenthartDepartment of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Peter van OoijenData Science in Health (DASH), University of Groningen, University Medical Center of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. p.m.a.van.ooijen@umcg.nl.

Funding

Chinese Scholarship Council and University of Groningen 202006150040Chinese Scholarship Council and University of Groningen 202006540020Chinese Scholarship Council and University of Groningen 202306310052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNew, intermediate-sized nodules in lung cancer screening undergo follow-up CT, but some of these will resolve. We evaluated the performance of a multi-view convolutional neural network (CNN) in distinguishing resolving and non-resolving new, intermediate-sized lung nodules. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study utilized data on 344 intermediate-sized nodules (50-500 mm

resultsAmong all nodules, 18.3% (63) were resolving. The multi-view CNN model achieved an AUC of 0.81, with a mean sensitivity of 0.63 (SD, 0.15) and a mean specificity of 0.93 (SD, 0.02). The model significantly improved performance compared to 2D, 2.5D, or 3D models (p < 0.05). Under the premise of specificity greater than 90% (meaning < 10% of non-resolving nodules are incorrectly identified as resolving), follow-up CT in 14% of individuals could be prevented.

conclusionThe multi-view CNN model achieved high specificity in discriminating new intermediate nodules that would need follow-up CT by identifying non-resolving nodules. After further validation and optimization, this model may assist with decision-making when new intermediate nodules are found in lung cancer screening. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The multi-view CNN-based model has the potential to reduce unnecessary follow-up scans when new nodules are detected, aiding radiologists in making earlier, more informed decisions. KEY POINTS: Predicting the resolution of new intermediate lung nodules in lung cancer screening CT is a challenge. Our multi-view CNN model showed an AUC of 0.81, a specificity of 0.93, and a sensitivity of 0.63 at the nodule level. The multi-view model demonstrated a significant improvement in AUC compared to the three 2D models, one 2.5D model, and one 3D model.

Indexed as

Computed tomographyConvolutional neural networksDeep learningPulmonary nodule

Identifiers

PMID40579621
PMCPMC12205119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.