ArticleInsights into imaging2025
A multi-view CNN model to predict resolving of new lung nodules on follow-up low-dose chest CT.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inter-Slice Representation Outweighs Bounding-Box Supervision Extent in Lightweight 2.5D Pulmonary Nodule Detection: A Whole-Volume Benchmark on LUNA16.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A narrative review on CT-based evaluation and prediction of lung nodule growth: current status and future directions.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Review
- [Expert Consensus on Precision Management of Pulmonary Nodules (2026 Version)].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026Article
- Analyzing histopathological images using fused CNN features based on the geometric active contour method for early diagnosis of lung and colon cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveNew, intermediate-sized nodules in lung cancer screening undergo follow-up CT, but some of these will resolve. We evaluated the performance of a multi-view convolutional neural network (CNN) in distinguishing resolving and non-resolving new, intermediate-sized lung nodules. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study utilized data on 344 intermediate-sized nodules (50-500 mm
resultsAmong all nodules, 18.3% (63) were resolving. The multi-view CNN model achieved an AUC of 0.81, with a mean sensitivity of 0.63 (SD, 0.15) and a mean specificity of 0.93 (SD, 0.02). The model significantly improved performance compared to 2D, 2.5D, or 3D models (p < 0.05). Under the premise of specificity greater than 90% (meaning < 10% of non-resolving nodules are incorrectly identified as resolving), follow-up CT in 14% of individuals could be prevented.
conclusionThe multi-view CNN model achieved high specificity in discriminating new intermediate nodules that would need follow-up CT by identifying non-resolving nodules. After further validation and optimization, this model may assist with decision-making when new intermediate nodules are found in lung cancer screening. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The multi-view CNN-based model has the potential to reduce unnecessary follow-up scans when new nodules are detected, aiding radiologists in making earlier, more informed decisions. KEY POINTS: Predicting the resolution of new intermediate lung nodules in lung cancer screening CT is a challenge. Our multi-view CNN model showed an AUC of 0.81, a specificity of 0.93, and a sensitivity of 0.63 at the nodule level. The multi-view model demonstrated a significant improvement in AUC compared to the three 2D models, one 2.5D model, and one 3D model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.