ArticleInsights into imaging2025
A two-step automatic identification of contrast phases for abdominal CT images based on residual networks.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo develop a deep learning model based on Residual Networks (ResNet) for the automated and accurate identification of contrast phases in abdominal CT images.
methodsA dataset of 1175 abdominal contrast-enhanced CT scans was retrospectively collected for the model development, and another independent dataset of 215 scans from five hospitals was collected for external testing. Each contrast phase was independently annotated by two radiologists. A ResNet-based model was developed to automatically classify phases into the early arterial phase (EAP) or late arterial phase (LAP), portal venous phase (PVP), and delayed phase (DP). Strategy A identified EAP or LAP, PVP, and DP in one step. Strategy B used a two-step approach: first classifying images as arterial phase (AP), PVP, and DP, then further classifying AP images into EAP or LAP. Model performance and strategy comparison were evaluated.
resultsIn the internal test set, the overall accuracy of the two-step strategy was 98.3% (283/288; p < 0.001), significantly higher than that of the one-step strategy (91.7%, 264/288; p < 0.001). In the external test set, the two-step model achieved an overall accuracy of 99.1% (639/645), with sensitivities of 95.1% (EAP), 99.4% (LAP), 99.5% (PVP), and 99.5% (DP).
conclusionThe proposed two-step ResNet-based model provides highly accurate and robust identification of contrast phases in abdominal CT images, outperforming the conventional one-step strategy. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Automated and accurate identification of contrast phases in abdominal CT images provides a robust tool for improving image quality control and establishes a strong foundation for AI-driven applications, particularly those leveraging contrast-enhanced abdominal imaging data. KEY POINTS: Accurate identification of contrast phases is crucial in abdominal CT imaging. The two-step ResNet-based model achieved superior accuracy across internal and external datasets. Automated phase classification strengthens imaging quality control and supports precision AI applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.