ReviewChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Anal cancer-Interaction between outpatient and inpatient treatment].
Review in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnal cancer is a rare but increasingly more frequently diagnosed entity. The treatment mostly consists of a combination of surgery and/or combined radiotherapy/chemotherapy. In advanced cases, extensive visceral resection may be necessary. In most cases, treatment is interdisciplinary and includes both outpatient and inpatient treatment phases.
objectiveThe aim of this work is to shed light on the most important steps in the diagnostics and treatment of anal cancer with a focus on the interaction between outpatient and inpatient patient care. MATERIAL AND
methodsTo determine the evidence base for this article, a literature search was conducted in the PubMed database. In addition, the current guidelines and recommendations were included.
resultsOutpatient facilities are often responsible for initial diagnostics and follow-up care, while inpatient facilities are responsible for implementing the complex treatment measures. This interaction presents challenges, particularly in coordinating treatment processes, communicating relevant information and adhering to time schedules. Delays in the referral or follow-up care can lead to a worsening of the prognosis.
conclusionMultimodal and interdisciplinary treatment is essential for the successful treatment of anal cancer. Cross-sectoral cooperation between outpatient and inpatient care plays a central role. This is the only way to ensure the best possible oncological treatment while maintaining the quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.