ReviewNature biomedical engineering2025
Peripheral neural interfaces for reading high-frequency brain signals.
Review in Nature biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate and robust recording and decoding from the central nervous system (CNS) is essential for advances in human-machine interfacing. Technologies for direct measurements of CNS activity are limited by their resolution, sensitivity to interference and invasiveness. Motor neurons (MNs) represent the motor output layer of the CNS, receiving and sampling signals from different regions in the nervous system and generating the neural commands that control muscles. Muscle recordings and deep learning decode the spiking activity of spinal MNs in real time and with high accuracy. The input signals to MNs can be estimated from MN outputs. Here we argue that peripheral neural interfaces using muscle sensors represent a promising, non-invasive approach to estimate some of the neural activity from the CNS that reaches the MNs but does not directly modulate force production. We discuss the evidence supporting this concept and the advances needed to consolidate and test MN-based CNS interfaces in controlled and real-world settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40579488What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.