Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40579488›Full record

ReviewNature biomedical engineering2025

Peripheral neural interfaces for reading high-frequency brain signals.

Jaime Ibáñez, Blanka Zicher, Etienne Burdet, Stuart N Baker, Carsten Mehring, Dario Farina

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jaime IbáñezBSICoS Group, Departamento de Ingeniería Electrónica y Comunicaciones, Instituto de Investigación en Ingeniería de Aragón (I3A), Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain. jibanez@unizar.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8439-151X
Blanka ZicherDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College, London, UK.
Etienne BurdetDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2123-0185
Stuart N BakerInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Carsten MehringBernstein Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8125-5205
Dario FarinaDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College, London, UK. d.farina@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7883-2697

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Euratom (H2020 Euratom Research and Training Programme 2014-2018) 899626EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 101077693EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 810346RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/V00896X/1RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) V00896XRCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/T020970/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and robust recording and decoding from the central nervous system (CNS) is essential for advances in human-machine interfacing. Technologies for direct measurements of CNS activity are limited by their resolution, sensitivity to interference and invasiveness. Motor neurons (MNs) represent the motor output layer of the CNS, receiving and sampling signals from different regions in the nervous system and generating the neural commands that control muscles. Muscle recordings and deep learning decode the spiking activity of spinal MNs in real time and with high accuracy. The input signals to MNs can be estimated from MN outputs. Here we argue that peripheral neural interfaces using muscle sensors represent a promising, non-invasive approach to estimate some of the neural activity from the CNS that reaches the MNs but does not directly modulate force production. We discuss the evidence supporting this concept and the advances needed to consolidate and test MN-based CNS interfaces in controlled and real-world settings.

Indexed as

BrainBrain-Computer InterfacesMotor NeuronsAnimalsDeep LearningHumansMuscle, Skeletal

Identifiers

PMID40579488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.