ArticleNature biomedical engineering2026
Self-powered rapid antigen-specific T-cell response assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections.
Article in Nature biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Subclinical tuberculosis": a person-centred critique.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Identification of a Four-Biomarker Panel for the Diagnosis of Tuberculous Pleural Effusion Using Olink Proteomics.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- A Year in Review on Tuberculosis and Non-tuberculous Mycobacteria Disease: A 2026 Update for Clinicians and Scientists.Pathogens & immunity · 2026Review
- 2025 in review.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) that evaluate an individual's T-cell activation response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb)-specific peptides serve an important role in diagnosing tuberculosis (TB). However, there are substantial challenges to the use of IGRAs in resource-limited settings. Further, IGRA diagnostic performance can also be compromised in anergic individuals. Here we describe a microfluidic chip-based antigen-specific T-cell response assay (ASTRA) that automates the detection of M.tb-specific T-cell activation responses to facilitate screening for latent M.tb infection and TB. We observe that ASTRA demonstrates high specificity for M.tb infection in independent patient cohorts. Compared with IGRA, ASTRA shows greater diagnostic sensitivity in individuals with HIV-1 co-infections (93.8% versus 67%), comparable diagnostic sensitivity in HIV-negative individuals (92.8%) and faster detection (4 h versus 24-48 h). We also find that a self-powered ASTRA chip that analysed microsample (~25 μl) whole-blood samples produced comparable results. ASTRA holds the potential to facilitate efforts to control the global TB epidemic and serve as a versatile platform for analysing T-cell responses across various infectious diseases and immunotherapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.