ArticleScientific reports2025
Hesperidin exacerbates the therapeutic potency of cisplatin against hepatocytotoxicity of Ehrlich ascites carcinoma in mice.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hesperidin and Hesperetin: Epigenetic-Stemness Crosstalk, Antitumor Mechanisms, Preclinical Data and Translation Barriers.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Berberine enhances cisplatin efficacy in ehrlich ascites carcinoma via modulation of apoptotic pathway and efferocytosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present research was set out to delineate the protective and therapeutic potency of hesperidin (Hesp) versus cisplatin (Cis) against the deleterious consequences of Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC) on the liver and the prospective mitigative effect of Hesp against Cis-mediated hepatotoxic side-effects. A total of 70 female mice were randomly assigned into control, Hesp, EAC, Hesp-protected, Hesp-treated, Cis-treated, and Cis + Hesp-treated groups. Mice inoculated with EAC cells exhibited significant reductions in the serum total protein and albumin levels, along with significant elevations of the serum aminotransferases, lactate dehydrogenase, amylase, and lipase activities, and alpha-fetoprotein level. A significant increment in malondialdehyde level concomitantly with significant declines in reduced glutathione concentration and catalase activity were also observed in the liver of EAC-bearing mice. Additionally, marked hepatic pathological changes as well as a strong Ki-67 expression and a weak caspase-3 expression in the neoplastic cells infiltrating hepatocytes were observed. In contrast, the administration of Hesp and/or Cis to the EAC-bearing mice reversed, to varying degrees, the cytotoxic effects of EAC. Besides, Hesp minimized the harmful hepatic chemotherapeutic side-effects of Cis. Overall, Hesp could be a promising phytochemical against EAC-induced cytotoxicity with its potential to improve the antitumor efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs and minimize their hepatic adverse side-effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.