Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40579389›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of dermatology2025

Prognostic Biomarkers for Anti-PD-1 Monoclonal Antibodies in the First Line Treatment of Advanced Melanoma.

Marek Pásek, Emanuel Marques, Vojtěch Tretera, Petr Arenberger, Monika Arenbergerová, Jiří Šilar, David Šulc

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marek PásekDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Královské Vinohrady University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0875-8332
Emanuel MarquesDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, St. Joseph Local Health Unit, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1451-6115
Vojtěch TreteraDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Královské Vinohrady University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5557-6026
Petr ArenbergerDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Královské Vinohrady University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4800-5877
Monika ArenbergerováDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Královské Vinohrady University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7919-9619
Jiří ŠilarInstitute of Biostatics and Analysis Ltd., Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1290-947X
David ŠulcDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Pilsen and Krajská Zdravotní Masaryk Hospital, Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9373-9841

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 50% of patients with advanced melanoma treated with first-line anti-PD-1 immunotherapy achieve clinical benefit. However, to date, there are no validated biomarkers for objective response (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), or overall survival (OS) with this treatment.

methodsWe performed a unicentric retrospective analysis of ORR, PFS, and OS in 138 patients with advanced melanoma treated with first-line anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies. Baseline blood parameters were analyzed as potential predictive or prognostic biomarkers. ORR was assessed using both RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) v.1.1 and iRECIST (Immune Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors). Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves, and comparisons were made using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to determine independent prognostic factors for survival, and a logistic regression model was used for response.

resultsThe median follow-up was 44.1 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 40.4-49.4) months. Elevated pretreatment lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) were negative prognostic factors for PFS. However, only LDH remained statistically significant on multivariate analysis [hazard ratio (HR) 1.72, 95% CI: 1.09-2.70, p = 0.019, HR 1.69, 95% CI: 0.95-3.00, p = 0.072]. Increased pretreatment LDH level and SII were both negative prognostic factors for OS on multivariate analysis (HR 2.25, 95% CI: 1.35-3.75, p = 0.002, HR 2.37, 95% CI: 1.29-4.37, p = 0.006).

conclusionsElevated pretreatment levels of SII and LDH were shown to be independent negative prognostic factors for OS. According to the nomogram for OS, which considers a combination of pretreatment parameters including LDH and SII, it is possible to predict 24-month OS in the first line of anti-PD-1 therapy.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsMelanomaProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorSkin NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateL-Lactate DehydrogenaseMaleMiddle AgedNivolumabPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsL-Lactate DehydrogenaseNivolumabPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptoradvanced melanomaanti‐PD‐1immunotherapyLDHprognostic biomarkersSIIsunshield melanoma

Identifiers

PMID40579389
PMCPMC12418915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.