Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40579387›Full record

ArticleAnatomical sciences education2025

Ultrasound in anatomy education: Faculty perspectives from a global survey.

Johanna M de Lange, Karin J Baatjes, Wouter Willaert, Janine C Correia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johanna M de LangeDivision of Clinical Anatomy, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8313-7990
Karin J BaatjesDivision of Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8432-8844
Wouter WillaertDepartment of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0885-6749
Janine C CorreiaDivision of Clinical Anatomy, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3964-9889

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This exploratory study investigates anatomy faculty perceptions on the incorporation of ultrasound (US) in anatomy education, focusing on spatial understanding (SU) and cognitive load (CL) implications. An online survey was administered anonymously to members of the International Federation of Associations of Anatomists. The survey gathered quantitative and qualitative data, utilizing Likert scale- and open-ended questions. Quantitative results indicated a positive faculty disposition toward US as an educational tool, noting its potential to enhance SU by visualizing anatomical structures dynamically. However, concerns about increased CL due to technical and operational challenges were also highlighted. Thematic analysis of open-ended responses revealed three primary themes: US as a means for improved anatomical visualization, its role in reducing CL when appropriately integrated, and the logistical challenges associated with incorporating it into curricula. These findings align with prior research on student perspectives of US but provide a novel contribution by capturing the views of anatomy faculty. By offering faculty-driven insights, this study extends the literature on US in anatomy education and highlights the critical need for structured faculty training programs. The study underscores the importance of developing targeted US training for faculty to minimize CL impacts on both educators and students, optimizing the technology's educational potential. These insights contribute to a broader understanding of US in anatomy education and emphasize the need for institutional support, standardized curricula, and cost-effective implementation strategies. This research informs evidence-based curriculum development and practical integration strategies, aiding anatomy educators in making informed decisions about incorporating US into their teaching practices.

Indexed as

AnatomyFacultyFaculty, MedicalAdultCurriculumFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUltrasonographyanatomyclinical applicationcognitive loadmedical educationspatial understandingultrasound

Identifiers

PMID40579387
PMCPMC12511657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.