ArticleAnnals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc2025
Predictive Modeling of Heart Failure Outcomes Using ECG Monitoring Indicators and Machine Learning.
Article in Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementation of Machine Learning in Heart Failure Trials.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
- Prediction models and risk scores in different types of heart failure: a review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHeart failure (HF) is a major driver of global morbidity and mortality. Early identification of patients at risk remains challenging due to complex, multivariate clinical relationships. Machine learning (ML) methods offer promise for more accurate prognostication.
objectiveWe evaluated the predictive value of electrocardiogram (ECG)-derived features and developed an ML model to stratify HF risk.
methodsWe analyzed a public cohort of 1061 patients, of whom 589 (55.5%) developed HF. Records were randomly divided into training (70%, n = 742) and test (30%, n = 319) sets. After preprocessing, we trained a random forest (RF) classifier. Performance on the test set was assessed via accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Feature selection employed Gini importance and the Boruta algorithm, while SHAP values provided model interpretability.
resultsThe RF model achieved an AUC of 0.969, with 91.8% accuracy, 93.8% sensitivity, 89.4% specificity, and a 92.7% F1-score. The top predictors included ST depression (Oldpeak), maximum heart rate (MaxHR), ST-segment slope, and serum cholesterol. Confusion matrix analysis confirmed robust discrimination between HF and non-HF cases. SHAP interpretation reinforced the dominant influence of ECG-related indices and cholesterol on individual risk estimates.
conclusionAn RF model leveraging ECG features demonstrated excellent performance for HF risk prediction and highlighted key physiologic markers. Future work should integrate comorbidity profiles and detailed biochemical data to further enhance clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.