ArticleAnatomical sciences education2025
Anatomy learning profiles in relation to student motivation and academic success: A multi-center cross-sectional study.
Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring 3D anatomy: A free online course supporting novice learner inquiry and spatial conceptualization.Anatomical sciences education · 2026Article
- Anatomy learning profiles in relation to student motivation and academic success: A multi-center cross-sectional study.Anatomical sciences education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Learning strategies encompass the diverse approaches students employ to master challenging subjects like anatomy. However, research examining these strategies in isolation remains inconclusive. Recent evidence suggests a shift toward a person-centered paradigm that considers how student subgroups combine multiple learning strategies. This study advances this paradigm and identifies Anatomy Learning Profiles (ALPs) among 567 medical and dental students across six medical faculties by analyzing 13 self-reported cognitive, metacognitive, and resource management strategies using the LIST-K questionnaire. A latent profile analysis confirmed the existence of four ALPs among the study population: Active (26%), Collaborative (20%), Structured (39%), and Passive (15%). Each profile represented a unique combination of 13 learning strategies and was significantly shaped by individual and institutional factors. For example, students further along in their training were more likely to exhibit traits of the Collaborative ALP and less of the Structured ALP. Female and younger students predominantly adopted Structured profiles, while older students favored the Active profile. Moreover, students in modular curricula showed higher rates of Collaborative profiles, while traditional curricula fostered Structured profile membership. Importantly, Active and Collaborative ALP students outperformed the Structured and Passive ALPs, and Active ALP students demonstrated the highest motivation levels. Yet, despite lower motivation levels, Collaborative ALP students achieved comparable academic success, indicating that studying with peers may compensate for lower individual motivation. These findings contribute to understanding students' learning strategies and may provide a holistic basis for educational interventions in anatomy education that align with students' combined learning behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.