Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40579380›Full record

ArticleAnatomical sciences education2025

Anatomy learning profiles in relation to student motivation and academic success: A multi-center cross-sectional study.

Birte Barbian, Thomas Shiozawa, Morris Gellisch, Irene Brunk, Katharina Langer-Fischer, Nicole Wagner, Sina Benker, Michelle Bellstedt, Nils Otto, Dogus Darici

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Birte BarbianInstitute of Anatomy and Molecular Neurobiology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Thomas ShiozawaDepartment of Anatomy, Institute of Clinical Anatomy and Cell Analysis, Faculty of Medicine, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Morris GellischDepartment of Anatomy and Molecular Embryology, Institute of Anatomy, Medical Faculty, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1378-0280
Irene BrunkInstitute for Integrative Neuroanatomy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Katharina Langer-FischerInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Anatomy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Nicole WagnerInstitute of Institute for Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Sina BenkerInstitute of Anatomy and Molecular Neurobiology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Michelle BellstedtInstitute of Anatomy and Molecular Neurobiology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Nils OttoInstitute of Anatomy and Molecular Neurobiology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Dogus DariciInstitute of Anatomy and Molecular Neurobiology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2375-8792

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning strategies encompass the diverse approaches students employ to master challenging subjects like anatomy. However, research examining these strategies in isolation remains inconclusive. Recent evidence suggests a shift toward a person-centered paradigm that considers how student subgroups combine multiple learning strategies. This study advances this paradigm and identifies Anatomy Learning Profiles (ALPs) among 567 medical and dental students across six medical faculties by analyzing 13 self-reported cognitive, metacognitive, and resource management strategies using the LIST-K questionnaire. A latent profile analysis confirmed the existence of four ALPs among the study population: Active (26%), Collaborative (20%), Structured (39%), and Passive (15%). Each profile represented a unique combination of 13 learning strategies and was significantly shaped by individual and institutional factors. For example, students further along in their training were more likely to exhibit traits of the Collaborative ALP and less of the Structured ALP. Female and younger students predominantly adopted Structured profiles, while older students favored the Active profile. Moreover, students in modular curricula showed higher rates of Collaborative profiles, while traditional curricula fostered Structured profile membership. Importantly, Active and Collaborative ALP students outperformed the Structured and Passive ALPs, and Active ALP students demonstrated the highest motivation levels. Yet, despite lower motivation levels, Collaborative ALP students achieved comparable academic success, indicating that studying with peers may compensate for lower individual motivation. These findings contribute to understanding students' learning strategies and may provide a holistic basis for educational interventions in anatomy education that align with students' combined learning behaviors.

Indexed as

Academic SuccessAnatomyEducation, Medical, UndergraduateLearningMotivationStudents, DentalStudents, MedicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesCurriculumFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultanatomy educationanatomy learning profileslatent profile analysismulticenter study

Identifiers

PMID40579380
PMCPMC12511653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.