Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40579367›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2025

A two-step approach to simultaneously correct for selection and misclassification bias in nonprobability samples from hard-to-reach populations.

Christoffer Dharma, Peter Smith, Travis Salway, Dionne Gesink, Michael Escobar, Victoria Landsman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christoffer DharmaDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9032-3959
Peter SmithDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8286-4563
Travis SalwayCentre for Gender and Sexual Health Equity, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5699-5444
Dionne GesinkDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Michael EscobarDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Victoria LandsmanDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5238-3857

Funding

Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers studying hard-to-reach or minority populations are increasingly implementing nonprobability sampling strategies that are often prone to selection bias. To address this problem, existing statistical methods suggest integrating data from external probability sample, often collected by government agencies, with the nonprobability sample from the hard-to-reach population. These methods assume that all information collected in the probability sample is recorded without errors. This may not be the case if participants are unwilling to report their minority status, such as sexual orientation, truthfully in large-scale population-based surveys, leading to misclassification bias. In this paper, we propose a novel two-step approach aimed at addressing misclassification bias in the probability sample to improve the performance of the data integration methods aimed at addressing selection bias in the nonprobability sample. By applying the proposed method to simulated data, we demonstrate a significant reduction in bias and validate the proposed bootstrap variance estimator of the estimated mean (prevalence) under low, moderate, and high misclassification rates. This method is particularly beneficial when the misclassification rate is high. Finally, we illustrate the application of the two-step approach to estimate the prevalence of measures of social connectedness among sexual minority men using a real-world nonprobability sample.

Indexed as

Minority GroupsBiasHumansMaleModels, StatisticalPrevalenceSampling StudiesSelection BiasSexual and Gender Minoritieshard-to-reach populationLGBTQ+measurement biasmultiple imputationprevalence estimationpropensity scoresselection biassocial epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID40579367
PMCPMC12634122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.