ReviewClinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia2025
Monoclonal Gammopathies in Africa.
Review in Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Epidemiology of Monoclonal Gammopathies in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of MGUS and Multiple Myeloma.Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
People of African descent have a reported higher incidence of multiple myeloma (MM) and increased prevalence of its precursor conditions, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering MM (SMM). Despite this, research focusing on people of African descent remains sparse. Even in the absence of robust studies across African populations, major disparities are consistently reported. West Africans and South African Black men have a higher prevalence of MGUS than individuals of European descent. MM has been shown to occur in African individuals at a younger age of diagnosis compared to European individuals, with a relatively higher proportion of females (M/F ∼1 vs. 1.4 in Europeans), delayed diagnosis (symptoms to diagnosis 10-12 months), and a higher prevalence of bone disease at presentation. This review summarizes the existing literature on monoclonal gammopathies for African people and highlights critical gaps in our understanding of the disease within the diverse African population. Importantly, differences in disease biology, with respect to cytogenetic and immunologic differences, which contribute to disparate disease outcomes are discussed. Concerted efforts to bridge knowledge gaps through collaborative research initiatives, both within and beyond the African continent, are urgently needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.