ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
Inference of differential kinase interaction networks with KINference.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationDifferential kinase interaction networks (DKINs) are networks containing kinase-substrate links that are differentially active between two conditions. Existing methods are either able to predict condition-agnostic kinase-substrate links or condition-specific differential kinase activity, but do not provide differential kinase-substrate links. Moreover, existing methods for predicting kinase-substrate links usually rely on curated biochemical knowledge. Thus, there is a lack of data-driven DKIN inference methods that are also applicable when prior knowledge is scarce.
resultsTo address this need, we present KINference. KINference combines computation of a baseline KIN representing the space of all possible kinase-substrate links with filters applied to nodes and edges to identify differentially active subnetworks that are relevant in the context of a specific phosphoproteomics dataset. For the node filters, we rely on functional relevance and differential phosphorylation scores; for the edge filters, we make use of prize-collecting Steiner trees and correlations between phosphorylation sites of kinases and their target proteins. Tests on two phosphoproteomics datasets (kinase inhibition in breast cancer cells, SARS-CoV-2 infection in Calu-3 cells) show that the proposed filters produce significant results in terms of overlap with known interactions between kinases and phosphorylation sites. Furthermore, a case study on the SARS-CoV-2 infection data, suggests a potential host pathway linked to virus replication, showcasing the process of hypothesis generation utilizing DKINs computed by KINference. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: KINference is available as an R package at https://github.com/bionetslab/KINference and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15411150. Scripts to reproduce the results are available at https://github.com/bionetslab/KINference-Evaluation-Scripts and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15424599.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.