Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40579209›Full record

ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2025

Comparing the CO

Jonas Mairhofer, Katia Sangermano, Günther Morandell, Giuliano Piccoliori, Adolf Engl, Christian Josef Wiedermann

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonas MairhoferInstitute of General Practice and Public Health, Claudiana Higher Provincial School of Health Professions, Bolzano, Italy.
Katia SangermanoMedical Directorate, Azienda Sanitaria dell'Alto Adige, Bolzano, Italy.
Günther MorandellHospital Pharmacy Bolzano, Azienda Sanitaria dell'Alto Adige, Bolzano, Italy.
Giuliano PiccolioriInstitute of General Practice and Public Health, Claudiana Higher Provincial School of Health Professions, Bolzano, Italy.
Adolf EnglInstitute of General Practice and Public Health, Claudiana Higher Provincial School of Health Professions, Bolzano, Italy.
Christian Josef WiedermannInstitute of General Practice and Public Health, Claudiana Higher Provincial School of Health Professions, Bolzano, Italy christian.wiedermann@am-mg.claudiana.bz.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4639-8195

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInhalers for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are essential therapeutic interventions; however, they contribute significantly to healthcare-related CO

methodsThis cross-sectional analysis used regional healthcare prescription data for inhalers dispensed in South Tyrol in 2021 and 2022, encompassing approximately 540 000 inhabitants. CO

findingsA total of 100 778 inhalers were dispensed in 2021 (45 031 MDIs, 55 747 DPIs) and 101 334 in 2022 (49 711 MDIs, 51 623 DPIs). MDIs were responsible for approximately 1000-1100 tonnes of CO

conclusionsUsage of DPIs over currently used MDIs in patients who can use them could mitigate healthcare-associated global warming potential, providing a viable strategy for climate change mitigation in respiratory care. Development of low-global warming potential MDIs is a complementary strategy.

Indexed as

AsthmaCarbon DioxideCarbon FootprintDry Powder InhalersMetered Dose InhalersPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdministration, InhalationAerosol PropellantsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansHydrocarbons, FluorinatedItalyAerosol PropellantsCarbon DioxideHydrocarbons, FluorinatedAsthma PharmacologyCOPD PharmacologyInhaler devices

Identifiers

PMID40579209
PMCPMC12207142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.