Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40579010›Full record

ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

Glatiramer Acetate Reduces Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Myocardial Infarction.

Steven Lehrer, Peter H Rheinstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Steven LehrerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, U.S.A.; steven.lehrer@mssm.edu.
Peter H RheinsteinDepartment of Pharmacology, Severn Health Solutions, Severna Park, MD, U.S.A.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimThe aim of the present study was to investigate on the repurposing of glatiramer acetate (GA), a drug traditionally used to treat multiple sclerosis, as well as explore GA potential to treat cardiac ischemia in rodent models. It has been shown that GA exerts immunomodulatory effects that reduced inflammation and increased repair of heart tissue following myocardial infarction (MI) in mice and rats. GA has been shown to enhance cardiac function by promoting angiogenesis, reducing scar tissue, and protecting cardiomyocytes from ischemic damage. MATERIALS AND

methodsRisteys/FinnGen and MedWatch/OpenVigil data were used to assess the effects of GA on the heart.

resultsThere was significantly less ischemic heart disease (p<0.001, Fisher's exact test) and cardiovascular disease (p<0.001) in 457 subjects with MS who used GA in Risteys/FinnGen. Analysis of MedWatch/OpenVigil data showed a significantly reduced risk of acute MI in individuals using GA, with a proportional reporting ratio (PRR) of 0.101, indicating statistical significance at the 95% confidence level. Additionally, analysis of MedWatch/OpenVigil data indicated a decreased risk of cardiovascular disease in GA users, with a PRR of 0.345, reaching statistical significance at the 95% confidence level.

conclusionDespite rare adverse cardiovascular side-effects and given its established safety profile, GA shows promise as a novel treatment option for heart disease. Further studies could lead to an important new use of GA especially in patients who do not receive tissue plasminogen activator within the first few hours following an MI.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesGlatiramer AcetateMultiple SclerosisMyocardial InfarctionAdultAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedGlatiramer Acetateautonomic nervous systemcardiovascular effectschest painGlatiramer acetateimmunomodulationmultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID40579010
PMCPMC12223661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.