ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Following Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Total Mesorectal Excision in Rectal Cancer.
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Value of Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels After Chemoradiotherapy for Advanced Low Rectal Cancer.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimThis study investigated the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) after total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer in patients who responded well to neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (nCCRT). PATIENTS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included patients with rectal cancer treated at Taipei Veterans General Hospital (2009-2017). Among 302 patients who underwent nCCRT and TME, 178 good responders [pathologic complete response (pCR), pT1, or pT2] were analyzed. Patients were grouped based on ACT administration. Primary outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS) and recurrence. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to assess ACT efficacy.
resultsThe ACT group (n=96) had poorer baseline disease characteristics, including higher initial clinical T and N stages. However, recurrence rates did not differ significantly between ACT and non-ACT groups (23.2%
conclusionThe role of ACT remains inconclusive after TME for rectal cancer in patients who respond well to nCCRT. Surgical pT stage, particularly pT3 and pT4, remain a significant predictor of recurrence, emphasizing its importance in risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.