ArticleJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM2025
Virtual Preconception Risk Assessment and Counseling In Primary Health Care.
Article in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organisation, Financing, and Implementation of Preconception Care in Primary Care: Implications for Women's Health and Well-Being.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Women's Health Care, Prevention in Practice, and Common Medical Illnesses.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFMArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProfessional association recommendations call for integrating preconception health promotion with primary care, yet there are scarce tools and implementation research to support practices in doing so. PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of integrating a preconception health digital risk assessment and virtual coaching into women's primary care encounters.
methodsIn the Emory Family Medicine Clinic, female patients 21 to 40 years of age with a well-woman or chronic condition encounter scheduled between 9/1/2022 and 5/1/2023 were invited to participate. Consenting patients were provided the
resultsOf 46 enrolled patients, 44 (96%) made a FRAME™ account, 38 (86%) completed the risk assessment, 34 (89%) completed virtual coaching, and 24 (71%) had a physician discuss their preconception health assessment during the primary care encounter. Nearly 80% of patients reported an increase in confidence in discussing fertility with their physician, and 50% reported they would not otherwise have brought up fertility and preconception health during the encounter. Both patients and physicians were satisfied with the process and viewed it as helping motivate positive changes in patient health and health behaviors.
conclusionThe completion of preconception digital risk assessment and virtual counseling facilitates discussion of preconception health during primary care encounters and shows promise for improving women's health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.