ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2025
Development and evaluation of a quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with orbital malignant tumours.
Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOrbital malignant tumours seriously affect the quality of life of patients; however, there is currently no quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with orbital malignant tumours.
objectiveTo develop and evaluate a quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with orbital malignant tumours.
methodsA pool of items was generated through a literature search, expert meeting and patient interview. Pre-survey and scale evaluation were performed, the quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with orbital malignant tumours (QLQ-OT) was modified, and the scale was evaluated by measuring the quality of life of 46 patients with orbital tumours.
resultsThe effective rate of QLQ-OT was 97.4%, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was >0.6, and the test-retest reliability Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was >0.7, suggesting good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The Pearson correlation coefficients were >0.8 between individual domain scores; > 0.6 between items and their own domains in the QLQ-OT; and >0.6 between domains and their corresponding domains in Quality of Life Center Questionnaire, thereby indicating good content, convergent and criterion-related validity. Ten principal components (the initial eigenvalues >1) were abstracted from 38 items of the general by factor analysis, accounting for 81.0% of cumulative variance.
conclusionsQLQ-OT has good compliance, reliability, validity and responsiveness and can be used to measure the quality of life of patients with orbital malignant tumours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.