ArticleBlood cancer discovery2025
DLBCL Cells Emerge after CD19 CAR T Cells with Cross-Antigen Resistance and a Gene Signature Predictive of Clinical CAR T-cell Response.
Article in Blood cancer discovery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tisa-cel and axi-cel CAR structure influences the development of resistance to CD19-CAR-T therapy.Leukemia · 2026Article
- Outcomes and salvage strategies for large B-cell lymphoma progressing after second-line CAR T-cell therapy: A DESCAR-T study from the LYSA group.HemaSphere · 2026Article
- CNS infiltration by zamtocabtagene autoleucel tandem CD20/CD19 CAR T cells leading to complete remission in a patient with primary CNS lymphoma.Haematologica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current understanding of lymphoma cell-intrinsic mechanisms of relapse following chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) include antigen loss and apoptosis resistance. Herein, CD19 CAR T-cell response and resistance were modeled, and it was identified that treatment-naïve CD19 expression does not correlate with CAR T-cell sensitivity, but resistance is frequently accompanied by reversible downregulation of CD19 that once restored is not paralleled with restored sensitivity to CAR T cell-mediated killing. Profiling a suite of DLBCL cell lines to CD19 CAR T-cell sensitivity reveals that DLBCL cells become nonresponsive to CAR T cell-killing, including to alternative antigen targeting of CD20 or CD22. Leveraging these resistant models, we identified gene signatures present in the CAR T cell-resistant DLBCL cell lines that correlate with patient response to CTL019 in two independent clinical trials. Finally, we show that combination strategies to overcome this resistance, including up-front dual-antigen targeting and combined treatment with an Mcl-1 inhibitor, improve CAR T-cell responses. SIGNIFICANCE: We demonstrate that DLBCL cells surviving CD19 CAR T-cell treatment develop a resistance phenotype with a "resistance signature" predictive of clinical CAR T-cell response, mediating cross-resistance between CAR T cells targeting different antigens. Our findings suggest that up-front dual-antigen targeting and combination therapies could improve clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.