Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40578876›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2025

Identifying patterns of multimorbidity, polypharmacy and frailty in the elderly: a clustering analysis of baseline data from a French, randomised, controlled trial in primary care.

Aziz Guellich, Nadia Oubaya, Joel Cogneau, François Lacoin, Pascal Clerc, Etienne Audureau, Julien Le Breton

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03298386 (Elderly Appropriate Treatment in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03298386 nacompletednot on this map

Elderly Appropriate Treatment in Primary Care (EAT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2017 to 2019Enrolled3,032ConditionsElderly, PolypharmacyArmsSystematic medication review with the STOPP/START tool
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. [Why represcribing instead of deprescribing?]Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aziz GuellichSociété Française de Médecine Générale (SFMG), F-92130 Issy-les-Moulineaux, France.
Nadia OubayaIMRB, CEpiA Team, Univ Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, F-94010 Creteil, France.
Joel CogneauInstitut de Recherche en Médecine Générale (IRMG), F-75005 Paris, France.
François LacoinInstitut de Recherche en Médecine Générale (IRMG), F-75005 Paris, France.
Pascal ClercSociété Française de Médecine Générale (SFMG), F-92130 Issy-les-Moulineaux, France.
Etienne AudureauIMRB, CEpiA Team, Univ Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, F-94010 Creteil, France.
Julien Le BretonSociété Française de Médecine Générale (SFMG), F-92130 Issy-les-Moulineaux, France j.le.breton.com@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7531-1132

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify distinct profiles among elderly patients in primary care so that general practitioners (GPs) can develop more targeted care strategies.

designA cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the French nationwide 'Elderly Appropriate Treatment in Primary Care' trial.

settingPrimary care in France: 277 GPs included patients.

participantsThe study participants were aged 75 or over, living at home, and taking five or more prescription medications. Of the 2724 patients included, 2651 were analysed. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: To identify specific patterns of multimorbidity, polypharmacy and frailty, we applied an unsupervised clustering analysis with self-organising maps.

resultsSeven clusters were identified: cluster 1 (16% of the patients) comprised frail men and women with cardiovascular, respiratory, musculoskeletal and endocrine diseases and marked polypharmacy; cluster 2 (9.3%, mainly men) comprised frail patients with cancer and cardiovascular or urogenital/renal diseases; cluster 3 (15.5%, mainly men) comprised not-very-frail patients with cardiovascular and urogenital/renal diseases; cluster 4 (18.1%) comprised not-very-frail men and women with cardiovascular diseases; cluster 5 (13.5%, mainly women) comprised mainly lonely, very frail patients with hypertension and endocrine, musculoskeletal and neuropsychiatric disorders; cluster 6 (19.1%, mainly women) comprised frail, socially isolated patients with digestive, musculoskeletal and neuropsychiatric diseases; lastly, cluster 7 (8.6%, mainly women) comprised frail, socially isolated patients with hypertension, cancer, or musculoskeletal, psychological and digestive disorders.

conclusionOur phenotypic classification of elderly patients might facilitate efforts to align healthcare services with the care needs that are encountered by GPs in their everyday practice. TRIAL REGESTRATION NUMBER: (NCT03298386).

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyFrailtyMultimorbidityPolypharmacyPrimary Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overCluster AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFranceHumansMaleAgedChronic DiseaseFrailtyPolypharmacyPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID40578876
PMCPMC12207111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.