ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2025
Developing interpretable machine learning models to predict length of stay and disposition decision for adult patients in emergency departments.
Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging the black box: artificial intelligence in acute care needs greater interpretability and precision.BMJ health & care informatics · 2026Article
- Crowding in real-time: an artificial intelligence-based model to manage crowding in the emergency department (CRAMMED Study).BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Patient-level, Temporal, and Dynamic Operational Indicators of Emergency Department Prolonged Length of Stay: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveMachine learning (ML) models have emerged as tools to predict length of stay (LOS) and disposition decision (DD) in emergency departments (EDs) to combat overcrowding. However, site-specific ML models are not transferable to different sites. Our objective was to develop interpretable ML models to predict LOS and DD at specific time points, all while establishing a transparent data analysis framework. This framework was designed to be easily adapted by other institutions for the development of their own ML models.
methodsWe analysed data from 297 392 ED visits of patients aged 18 and above at a quaternary hospital between 30 June 2019 and 31 December 2022. Eight ML algorithms were evaluated, and ultimately, twelve lasso models built from 21 features were trained to predict four outcomes of LOS and DD at three time points post-triage. Hold-out testing and cross-validation were conducted for these models.
resultsThe area under the curve values were 0.862/0.868/0.878 for binary LOS predictions at 10, 60 and 120-minute time points and 0.839/0.851/0.863 for binary DD predictions. The accuracies were 60.2%/60.7%/61.9% for ternary LOS predictions and 61.5%/62.3%/63.4% for ternary DD predictions.
conclusionsInterpretable ML models demonstrated outstanding performances in predicting both LOS and DD. The transparent data analysis framework can be easily adapted by other institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.