Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40578849›Full record

ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2025

Developing interpretable machine learning models to predict length of stay and disposition decision for adult patients in emergency departments.

Long Song, Uwe Aickelin, Timothy N Fazio, Abhishek Sharma, Mojgan Kouhounestani, Samantha Plumb, Mark John Putland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Long SongSchool of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8494-4364
Uwe AickelinSchool of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2679-2275
Timothy N FazioEMR Team, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1700-2355
Abhishek SharmaHealth Intelligence Unit, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7591-4757
Mojgan KouhounestaniSchool of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7935-6410
Samantha PlumbThe Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Mark John PutlandDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia Mark.Putland@mh.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1994-252X

Funding

Ventral and dorsal visual streams in action planningK01MH002022 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI FREY, SCOTT H · 2002 to 2005
$632k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH002022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMachine learning (ML) models have emerged as tools to predict length of stay (LOS) and disposition decision (DD) in emergency departments (EDs) to combat overcrowding. However, site-specific ML models are not transferable to different sites. Our objective was to develop interpretable ML models to predict LOS and DD at specific time points, all while establishing a transparent data analysis framework. This framework was designed to be easily adapted by other institutions for the development of their own ML models.

methodsWe analysed data from 297 392 ED visits of patients aged 18 and above at a quaternary hospital between 30 June 2019 and 31 December 2022. Eight ML algorithms were evaluated, and ultimately, twelve lasso models built from 21 features were trained to predict four outcomes of LOS and DD at three time points post-triage. Hold-out testing and cross-validation were conducted for these models.

resultsThe area under the curve values were 0.862/0.868/0.878 for binary LOS predictions at 10, 60 and 120-minute time points and 0.839/0.851/0.863 for binary DD predictions. The accuracies were 60.2%/60.7%/61.9% for ternary LOS predictions and 61.5%/62.3%/63.4% for ternary DD predictions.

conclusionsInterpretable ML models demonstrated outstanding performances in predicting both LOS and DD. The transparent data analysis framework can be easily adapted by other institutions.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalLength of StayMachine LearningPatient DischargeAdultAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTriageYoung AdultEvidence-Based Emergency MedicineMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID40578849
PMCPMC12207108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.