ArticleThe oncologist2025
Long-term safety analysis of pooled data for tislelizumab as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced cancers.
Article in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTislelizumab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in solid tumors. This analysis evaluates its long-term safety. PATIENTS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on data from 8 randomized phase III clinical trials involving patients with advanced gastrointestinal (GI) or lung cancers who received tislelizumab. Endpoints included immune-mediated adverse events (imAEs) by tumor type, race, and treatment duration, including early (within 1 year) and delayed (>1 year) imAEs.
resultsIn all, 2636 patients (1415 with GI cancer, 1221 with lung cancer) were included in the analysis, with a median follow-up of 15.4 months. Most imAEs were low-grade. In GI cancers, 32.5% of patients experienced any-grade imAEs (7.3% grade ≥ 3). In lung cancers, 39.6% reported any-grade imAEs (8.2% grade ≥ 3). The most frequently reported imAEs were skin toxicity, hypothyroidism, pneumonitis, and hyperthyroidism. The incidence of imAEs was slightly higher in Asian patients compared with non-Asian patients (34.3% vs 26.9% in GI cancer and 35.5% vs 29.7% in lung cancer, respectively), but the incidence of grade ≥ 3 imAEs remained similar (7.5% vs 6.9% in GI cancer and 6.1% vs 7.2% in lung cancer, respectively). Most imAEs occurred within 6 months of treatment initiation. Delayed imAEs were infrequent and predominantly occurred while patients were still receiving tislelizumab therapy.
conclusionsTislelizumab's safety profile, as monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy, remains consistent with previous reports across tumor types. Delayed imAEs were relatively infrequent, with no new signals identified in this long-term safety analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.