ReviewDevelopmental biology2025
Engineering development: From the repressilator and toggle switch to synthetic developmental biology.
Review in Developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The publication of two landmark papers in the year 2000 demonstrated that scientists could rationally engineer genetic circuits to perform desired biological processes commonly found in nature. Elowitz and Leibler constructed a repressilator based on a negative feedback loop that showed oscillatory behavior, and the Collins lab engineered a toggle switch that was able to switch between and maintain stable states in response to external stimuli. Although built upon a long history of conceptual and technical advances in the field, both studies were nevertheless instrumental in transforming the way investigators studied complex biological processes. Rather than using a top-down approach to dissect and analyze individual components of biological processes, both research teams employed a bottom-up approach, creating genetic devices that reconstructed fundamental cellular processes-in essence, building to understand. As described in this review, this bottom-up approach was particularly transformative in the field of developmental biology where the "build to understand" approach yielded important insights into long-standing problems in developmental biology: the mechanisms underlying promiscuous, combinatorial signaling; how cells acquire a stable fate; and the emergence of complex patterns. Additionally, these papers laid the foundation for an array of technical advances that spawned the field of synthetic developmental biology and its fruitful applications to tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.