ArticleAmerican journal of infection control2025
Characterization of patients with Candida (Candidozyma) auris before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York, 2017-2022.
Article in American journal of infection control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surveillance for Candida auris - United States, 2022-2024.Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002) · 2026Article
- Progression from Candida (Candidozyma) auris colonization to bloodstream infection, New York State (NYS) and Chicago.American journal of infection control · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCandida auris causes severe, invasive infections. We characterized C. auris epidemiology in New York before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
methodsMultiple statewide databases were linked to assess demographic and clinical characteristics and outcomes among C. auris screening cases (patients tested for colonization screening) and clinical cases (patients tested to diagnose disease). Cases diagnosed during 2017-2022 were divided into four phases (pre-COVID-19, first wave, ongoing mitigation, and vaccine era ) and compared. Joinpoint analysis was used to assess monthly percentage change (MPC) and temporal trends among clinical cases.
resultsDuring the first wave, higher proportions of C. auris cases were among Black and Hispanic patients (clinical and screening), patients from high social vulnerability index neighborhoods (clinical), and patients aged < 60 years (screening), compared with pre-COVID-19. Increased proportions of Hispanic patients and those aged < 60 years among screening cases persisted through ongoing mitigation and vaccine era. MPC of clinical cases was stable throughout the analysis period (1.97%), and there were no significant joinpoints.
conclusionsCOVID-19 hospitalizations might have driven shifts in characteristics of clinical and screening C. auris cases. Clinical C. auris incidence increased during 2017-2022, but the incidence slope did not increase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.