ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2025
Stratified reproduction and threats to reproductive justice for immigrants: Decision-making for fertility using an ecological model.
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fertility intentions among undocumented immigrants: Exploratory results from a mixed-methods survey in California.Sexual & reproductive healthcare : official journal of the Swedish Association of Midwives · 2026Article
- Centering Undocumented Immigrants: A Cross-Sectional Study of Sexual and Reproductive Health of Undocumented Asian and Latinx Immigrants in California.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2026Article
- Experiences of family building counseling and perceptions of reproductive technology among adults with sickle cell disease.PloS one · 2026Article
- Access to and quality of contraceptive healthcare for undocumented immigrant women in California.SSM. Qualitative research in health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, immigrants in the U.S. have experienced shifting immigration policies, creating an environment of uncertainty. These policies often exacerbate social and economic vulnerabilities among the 11 million undocumented immigrants in the US. Stratified reproduction occurs when society or institutions deem certain individuals "undeserving" of reproduction. Undocumented immigrants in the U.S. experience a number of threats to their reproductive health. Yet, there is little empirical data on how immigration status may influence their decision-making to have children or not have children. This study explores the complex factors that influence fertility decisions among undocumented individuals in the U.S. Drawing on 30 life history interviews with 14 Asian and 16 Latinx undocumented immigrants conducted between February and July 2022, results highlight how societal, institutional, interpersonal, and internalized factors shape reproductive choices. Societal influences include the impact of their status on financial resources, immigration enforcement, fear of family separation, and experiences of racism and discrimination. Institutional factors include high costs for healthcare. Interpersonal factors such as pressures of gender and cultural norms within families further complicate these decisions. Additionally, many undocumented individuals described internalized struggles, including feelings of an "unfinished childhood". However, the study also reveals how these challenges can lead to resilience, with some participants expressing a desire to become parents as a source of hope. This research provides important insights into how undocumented status impacts reproductive decisions and highlights the need to address the unique challenges faced by undocumented immigrants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.