ArticleJMIR research protocols2025
Validation and Comparison of Pediatric Appendicitis Scores and Management Strategies (Project SPASMS): Protocol for a Prospective Multicenter Observational Study.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk Factors for False-Positive Ultrasound in Pediatric Acute Appendicitis: A Prospective Cohort Study.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Suspected Pediatric Appendicitis Management in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Observational Study in an Australian Pediatric Emergency Department.Pediatric emergency care · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAbdominal pain is a common reason for children to attend the Emergency Department (ED) with acute appendicitis being the most common surgical cause. Various clinical prediction scores (CPSs) have been developed to assist in determining the risk of appendicitis; however, CPSs have been inadequately validated in children and haphazardly adopted in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) EDs.
objectiveThis study aims to compare and validate various CPSs for diagnosing pediatric appendicitis in children presenting to ANZ EDs.
methodsThis prospective multicenter observational study across 10 ANZ EDs is recruiting children 5-17 years presenting to participating EDs with acute right-sided or generalized abdominal pain lasting ≤7 days and clinician suspicion of appendicitis. CPSs will be calculated by the study team from clinician-recorded data and clinician gestalt recorded on a visual analog scale. Accuracy of CPSs will be assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and proportions correctly identified as either low-risk or high-risk based on the CPSs published cutoffs. The final diagnosis of appendicitis will be confirmed on histopathology, and the absence of appendicitis confirmed by telephone, email, or a combination of both to follow up for those discharged directly from ED.
resultsThis study received funding in July 2023 and started enrolment in August 2023. As of October 2024, we have enrolled and completed follow-up on 1227 participants with an expected end date in mid-2025.
conclusionsThis study aims to determine the best-performing CPS for diagnosing pediatric appendicitis in ANZ EDs. Implementation of this CPS in ANZ EDs has the potential to reduce health care costs, rationalize the use of health care resources, and improve the management and outcomes of childhood appendicitis.
trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12622001293752; https://tinyurl.com/242wwenx. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/67941.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.