Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40577613›Full record

ArticleJournal of economic entomology2025

The effect of fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) venom on ecologically relevant bacteria.

Ashley Morris, Robert K Vander Meer, Roberto Pereira, Rebecca Baldwin, Satya Chinta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of economic entomology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ashley MorrisDepartment of Entomology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-9289-902X
Robert K Vander MeerUnited States Department of Agriculture, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6879-9777
Roberto PereiraDepartment of Entomology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5618-7690
Rebecca BaldwinDepartment of Entomology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-7606-0540
Satya ChintaUnited States Department of Agriculture, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Funding

USDA-ARS Non-Assistance Cooperative Agreement 58-6036-0-010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fire ants, Solenopsis invicta Buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and Solenopsis geminata (Fabricius), have evolved a variety of physiological and chemical defenses against microbe introduction and infection in their colonies. Compounds of most interest are the piperidine alkaloids found in S. invicta and S. geminata. Alkaloids are produced by the poison gland, stored in the venom sac, and released through the sting. These compounds have antibiotic, antifungal, antiparasitic, antiviral, and hemolytic properties. We hypothesize that fire ants alter the microbiome of their environment through the consistent use of these chemicals in and around their nests, affecting plant-microbe interactions and the rhizobia-legume nodulation process. In this study, S. invicta and S. geminata worker ant venom extracts were evaluated in disc-diffusion bioassays against the nitrogen-fixing soybean (Glycine max L.) (Fabales: Fabaceae) symbionts Bradyrhizobium japonicum (Kirchner) (Hyphomicrobiales: Nitrobacteraceae) and Bradyrhizobium elkanii Kuykendall and the microbial insecticide Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner (Bacillales: Bacillaceae). Venom extracts inhibited the growth of all tested microbes, with S. geminata extracts having a greater inhibitory effect than those from S. invicta.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntsAnt VenomsBradyrhizobiumAnimalsFire AntsSymbiosisAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnt Venomsalkaloidbradyrhizobianitrogensoybean

Identifiers

PMID40577613
PMCPMC12602152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.