ArticleOncology nursing forum2025
Cancer Care Affordability and the Healthcare Team: Expanding an Assessment of Clinical Perceptions and Attitudes in Nursing.
Article in Oncology nursing forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding financial toxicity in cancer care through a social-ecological lens.Current opinion in oncology · 2026Review
- Prevalence of financial toxicity and construction of a risk prediction model for lung cancer patients at 6 months after discharge.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Screened but Still Struggling: Challenges in Delivering Financial Assistance After Positive Financial Toxicity Screens.JCO oncology practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate nursing staff perceptions of financial toxicity (FT), its causes, and their role in mitigating it, as well as their prior training in addressing financial concerns. SAMPLE &
setting535 RNs, advanced practice providers, and ancillary staff at an urban comprehensive cancer center. METHODS & VARIABLES: Respondents completed an online survey, adapted from prior work with physicians, as part of a quality improvement effort.
resultsMost respondents (76%) felt (a) they should play an active role in interventions to minimize FT and (b) they should be aware of a patient's risk of FT. A greater proportion of advanced practice providers felt they should play an active role in interventions compared to RNs (chi-square = 4.1, p = 0.04). Most respondents reported receiving no training on costs of care (87%) or how to have cost conversations (91%). Recommendations for mitigation included offering telehealth visits and changing follow-up intervals. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nursing staff, including RNs and advanced practice providers, want to play an active role in preventing and mitigating FT but often feel they do not have the training to do so. Future efforts should focus on FT education for nursing staff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.