ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025
What is the optimal In2Care stations density to achieve Aedes aegypti population reduction in a dengue endemic setting?
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutodissemination traps are among the most innovative strategies for suppressing mosquito vector populations. These traps are particularly effective against Aedes aegypti due to the species' skip oviposition behavior, where eggs from a single clutch are distributed across multiple breeding sites. Evaluating the efficacy of different densities of In2Care stations under large-scale field conditions is crucial for understanding their potential impact on Ae. aegypti populations. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsA total of 3,250 In2Care stations were deployed in Goiânia, the 10th largest city in Brazil, with an estimated population of 1.45 million. The field study lasted 14 months, with each station serviced bi-monthly. To assess the impact of In2Care, ovitraps were installed and inspected weekly to measure changes in the number of positive ovitraps and the average number of eggs laid by Ae. aegypti females in intervention areas compared to control neighborhoods. Over the course of the study, 666,204 eggs were sampled. The density of In2Care stations varied across neighborhoods, ranging from 220 to 555 stations per km2. In the high-density area (~555 stations per km2), the Ovitrap Positivity Index (OPI) decreased from 56.9% to 31.5%, while the average number of eggs per positive paddle dropped from 41.2 to 18.1-representing a 56% reduction in egg counts. Conversely, in the low- and medium-density, no significant effect was observed. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The recommended density of In2Care is about 2500 stations per Km2. Our results demonstrated stations density 4.5 times lower than the recommended density is able to reduce the frequency of positive ovitraps and the number of eggs collected on them. entomological indexes. Additional fieldwork in other entomological and epidemiological settings are needed to evaluate whether the In2Care density of ~555 units/Km2 observed for Goiânia was site-dependent or if it has borader applicability. Our results show that In2Care stations can effectively suppress Ae. aegypti populations over large geographic areas, with efficacy likely influenced by trap density.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.