ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Association of clinical laboratory parameters with latent tuberculosis infection among healthcare workers of primary health centers-A cross-sectional observational study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors associated with interferon-gamma release assay positivity in patients with psoriasis: a cross-sectional study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Validation and interpretation of machine-learning models for rapid identification of active tuberculosis infection using routine laboratory indicators.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Clinical laboratory analytes and platelet-associated parameters as surrogate markers of subclinical inflammation in latent tuberculosis infection.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at high risk of tuberculosis (TB) infection due to their continued occupational exposure to patients with active TB disease. The prevalence of latent TB infections (LTBI) among the HCWs of primary healthcare centers (PHCs) has seldom been investigated. PHCs provide effective and preventive medical care largely for the rural population. Comparatively, the HCWs of PHCs are likely to have an increased risk of occupational exposure and reactivation of LTBI. A cross-sectional study (March-April 2024) was carried out to assess the prevalence of LTBI among the HCWs of 64 PHCs across Thiruvallur district, India. Blood samples (n = 392) were analyzed using a commercial QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus assay. A comprehensive hematological, biochemical, and immunological workup was performed, including cell count, blood glucose determination, liver/renal function tests, and serum ferritin concentration estimation, which were subsequently correlated with LTBI status using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The study revealed an LTBI prevalence of 25.3% (n = 99) among HCWs of PHCs. The red cell distribution width (RDW) was significantly associated (p = 0.002) with LTBI positivity among the different parameters analyzed. Factors such as individuals' age (p = 0.029), underlying comorbid conditions (30.3%; p = 0.035), and longer employment duration (28%; p = 0.034) were significantly associated with IGRA positivity. Further, IGRA positivity was significantly associated with decreased RDW standard deviation (RDW-SD). This phenomenon was observed especially among females, the obese, and participants with the 'O' blood group. Although the exact prevalence of LTBI in the general population is not known, it is estimated to range from 20-48%. The study reported the prevalence of LTBI among HCWs of PHCs (25.3%) and factors associated with IGRA positivity including age, underlying comorbid conditions, and years of employment. Our findings will aid in developing and establishing an appropriate framework for TB screening and clinical testing guidance for HCWs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.